Is the Osaka Expo necessary for Japan? Examining the arguments of the proponents and opponents

Read Time:2 Minute, 41 Second

The Japan International Exposition (Osaka-Kansai Expo), which is scheduled to be held in Osaka in 2025, has sparked a controversy among Japanese people over its preparation status, economic effects, and significance. On one hand, some people expect that the Expo will be a chance to open up Japan’s future. On the other hand, some people criticize that the Expo is a waste of tax money. In this article, we will sort out the arguments of the proponents and opponents, and examine their grounds and challenges.

Proponents’ argument: The Expo is a place for Japan’s innovation and international contribution

The people who support the Expo think that the Expo will be a place for Japan’s innovation and international contribution. Specifically, they point out the following points.

The Expo will stimulate Japan’s industry and society by introducing the world’s cutting-edge technologies and cultures. In particular, it is expected that Japan will demonstrate its leadership in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, environment, and energy.
The Expo will enhance Japan’s international presence and influence by deepening its exchanges with various countries and regions in the world. In particular, it is believed that Japan can build trust relationships with developing regions such as Asia and Africa by providing cooperation and assistance.
The Expo will contribute to Japan’s tourism and regional revitalization by promoting the attractiveness of Osaka and Kansai to the world. In particular, the venue built on the artificial island of Yumeshima in Osaka Bay will appeal with its attractions such as the “Big Roof”, the world’s largest wooden structure, and the unique pavilions of each country.

Opponents’ argument: The Expo is a waste of tax money and has little significance

The people who oppose the Expo think that the Expo is a waste of tax money and has little significance. Specifically, they point out the following points.

The cost of building the Expo venue has ballooned to 235 billion yen, which is about 1.9 times the original budget, and one-third of it will be borne by the national government. In addition, the national burden will exceed 80 billion yen for the construction of the Japan Pavilion and the support for the participation of developing countries. These costs will come from the taxpayers’ money, but many people feel that the necessity and effect of them have not been sufficiently explained.
The construction of the Expo venue is significantly delayed due to the impact of inflation and labor shortage. In particular, the pavilions that each country builds on its own are in a situation where many countries have not decided on the construction contractors, and no country has started construction. It is unclear whether it will be completed by the opening, and there is a possibility that the quality and safety of the Expo will be affected.
The significance of the Expo has become outdated with the times. With the development of the Internet and SNS, the latest information and culture of the world can be obtained anytime and anywhere. There are few things that can only be seen or experienced at the Expo, and many people feel that the motivation to go to the Expo has faded.